[1]龚 浩.关于清代应征、实征以及实得田赋规模的估计——以康熙至嘉庆时期的江苏各类田赋规模变化为例[J].中国农史,2021,40(06):72-86.
 GONG Hao.The Estimation of the Scale on the Land Tax that should be levied,the Land Tax Actually Collected and the Actual Land Taxation in the Qing Dynasty:Taking Jiangsu Province from Kangxi to Jiaqing Period as an Example[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(06):72-86.
点击复制

关于清代应征、实征以及实得田赋规模的估计——以康熙至嘉庆时期的江苏各类田赋规模变化为例()
分享到:

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
40
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
72-86
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-12-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Estimation of the Scale on the Land Tax that should be levied,the Land Tax Actually Collected and the Actual Land Taxation in the Qing Dynasty:Taking Jiangsu Province from Kangxi to Jiaqing Period as an Example
作者:
龚 浩
(中国社会科学院 当代中国研究所,北京 100009)
Author(s):
GONG Hao
(The Institute of Contemporary China Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100009)
关键词:
清代财政田赋蠲免
Keywords:
Qing Dynasty finance land tax land tax reduction
分类号:
S-09;K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
清代地丁田赋包括名义、应征、实征和实得等多种收入类型,各类型之间数额相差较大。康熙五十一年(1712)至雍正四年(1726)间,江苏实得田赋仅294万两,分别占名义田赋(402万两)的73.1%、应征田赋(362万两)的81.2%和实征田赋(326万两)的90.2%。从长期看,应征田赋从康熙时期的372万两下降到嘉庆时期的322万两,但实征田赋一直维持在307万两上下。应征田赋的降低、赋税征管制度的完善和以仓补税,使田赋完纳率(实征田赋占应征田赋比)明显提高。如不考虑币值变化且从长期来看,实征田赋规模保持稳定,即政府可获得田赋收入规模稳定,这也就意味着:蠲免政策对田赋负担的减轻作用有限;国家赋税汲取能力与田赋负担长期稳定;减赋的目的是调整朝廷与地方政府间关系而非降低百姓的赋税负担,其主要受益者是地方官员而非百姓。
Abstract:
The income of land tax in the Qing Dynasty includes the nominal land tax, the land tax that should be levied, the land tax actually collected and the actual land tax. This paper makes a comparative study on historical materials, such as "tax collection", "records", "local Chronicles", "Records of the Qing Dynasty" and "Grand Qing Ceremony".In Jiangsu province, from the fifty-first year of Kangxi to the fourth year of Yongzheng, The actual land tax was 2.94 million taels, accounting for 73.1% of the nominal land tax(4.02 million), 81.2% of the applied land tax(3.62 million) and 90.2% of the actual land tax(3.26million).The land tax that should be levied decreased from 3.72 million taels in Kangxi period to 3.22 million taels in Jiaqing Period.The land tax actually collected maintained at 3.07 million for a long time.The reasons for the increase of the total payment rate of farmland tax include the decrease of the land tax that should be levied, the improvement of tax collection and management system and the use of warehouses to pay taxes.As a result, the tax exemption policy has limited effect on reducing the burden of agricultural tax in the long term. Long-term stability of national tax absorption capacity and farmland burden.The purpose of tax cuts is to adjust the relationship between central and local governments rather than reduce the tax burden on ordinary people, and the main beneficiaries are local officials rather than ordinary people.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘宗志.从清代社仓与义仓之差异看民间社会救济之增长[J].中国农史,2018,37(02):98.
[2]王培华 戴国庆.清代永定河下游与白洋淀的农业及其环境效应[J].中国农史,2018,37(02):128.
[3]施由明.论清代江西农村社会的溺女之风与宗族应对[J].中国农史,2017,36(05):100.
 SHI You-ming.The Ethos of “Female Infanticide ”in the Rural Society of Jiangxi in Qing Dynasty and Response of the Clans[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(06):100.
[4]黄忠鑫.山林经济变动与信贷契约书写的演变——清代歙县璜尖村的个案研究[J].中国农史,2017,36(06):101.
 HUANG Zhong-xin.Forestry Economy Changes for Evolution of the Form of Credit Contract——A Study Based on Huangjian Village of She County during Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(06):101.
[5]王大宾.人地关系与清代河南农业经营方式的调整[J].中国农史,2018,37(06):80.
 WANG Da-bin.The Relationship between Human and Land and the Economic Information of Agriculture in Henan Region in the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2018,37(06):80.
[6]王大宾.人地关系与作物组合——清代河南地区农作物构成[J].中国农史,2016,35(01):29.
 WANG Da-bin.Man-Land Relationship and Crop Combination——Crops Constitute in Henan in the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(06):29.
[7]李昕升 王思明.清代番薯在江西的引种和推广[J].中国农史,2016,35(02):39.
 LI Xin-sheng WANG Si-ming.Introduction and Spread of Sweet Potato in Jiangxi Province[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(06):39.
[8]李丹丹 王元林.清代肉桂产地变迁与国内外贸易探析[J].中国农史,2019,38(03):114.
 LI Dan-dan WANG Yuan-lin.Analysis on the Changes of Cinnamon Origin and Domestic and Foreign Trade in the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2019,38(06):114.
[9]盛 承.清代陕西长安咸宁二县乡村区划的演变[J].中国农史,2020,39(05):123.
 SHENG Cheng.Evolution of the Administrative Division under the County in ChangAn and XianNing county, Shaanxi Province During the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(06):123.
[10]谢 祺.清代湘黔苗疆的粮饷供给模式及其分化原因探析[J].中国农史,2021,40(04):59.
 XIE Qi.Study on the Causes of the Differentiation of Grain and Rate Supply Mode in Hunan, Guizhou and Miao Areas in Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(06):59.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-01-09