[1]陈加晋.中国农业文化遗产话语的百年进路与本土化建构[J].中国农史,2023,42(03):127-139.
　CHEN Jiajin.The Centennial Approach and Localization Construction of Chinese Agricultural Heritage Discourse[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2023,42(03):127-139.
点击复制

中国农业文化遗产话语的百年进路与本土化建构()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
42
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
127-139
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Centennial Approach and Localization Construction of Chinese Agricultural Heritage Discourse
作者:
陈加晋
（南京农业大学 马克思主义学院，江苏 南京 210095）
Author(s):
CHEN Jiajin
（College of Marxism, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095）
关键词:
农业文化遗产; 权威性遗产话语; 话语实践; 本土化建构
Keywords:
agricultural heritage;  authoritative heritage discourse;  discourse practice;  localization construction
分类号:
S-09；K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
作为一种话语实践，农业文化遗产及其价值并非不证自明，而是经历了至少百年的话语构建历程。从近代社会的话语萌发，到新中国成立后农业历史学的学术话语实践，再到联合国粮农组织构建的权威性遗产话语体系，农业文化遗产的价值尺度逐步从个人与家庭的变成国家与国际的，期间国际组织、中国政府及专家学者等逐步合流掌握了遗产的话语权。尽管主导当下遗产实践的权威性遗产话语依然是对农业文化遗产最具意义的表达与阐释，但其本质上是一种西欧中心主义话语，遗产的多样性被“标准化”，同时在权力关系的分离与倒错现象中容易造成遗产的失真。构建农业文化遗产本土话语体系，需要在统合话语分析理论的基础上，以农业历史为基、地方叙事为本、农民群体为重、外国话语为参去开展话语“再建构”。
Abstract:
As a discourse practice, agricultural heritage and its value are not self-evident, but have gone through at least a century of discourse construction process. From the emergence of discourse in modern society, to the academic discourse practice of agricultural history after the founding of New China, and to the authoritative heritage discourse system constructed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the value scale of agricultural heritage has gradually shifted from individual and family to national and international. During this period, international organizations, the Chinese government, and experts and scholars gradually merged to master the discourse power of heritage. Although the authoritative discourse that dominates the current practice of agricultural heritage is still the most meaningful expression and interpretation of agricultural heritage, it is essentially a discourse of Western European Centralism , where the diversity of heritage is “standardized”, and at the same time, the separation and inversion of power relations can easily cause distortion of heritage. Building a local discourse system for agricultural heritage requires the integration of discourse analysis theory, with agricultural history as the foundation, local narrative as the foundation, farmer groups as the focus, and foreign discourse as the participation to carry out discourse “reconstruction”.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴合显.论重要农业文化遗产的当代创新利用[J].中国农史,2018,37(01):115.
　WU He-xian.Analysis on Contemporary Innovation and Utilization of Outstanding Agricultural Heritage Systems[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2018,37(03):115.
[2]张 苏.边疆少数民族农业文化遗产与一带一路文化交流[J].中国农史,2017,36(01):129.
　ZHANG Su.The Agricultural Heritage of Ethnic Minorities in China’s Border Areas and the Culture Communication of “the Belt and Road”[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(03):129.
[3]丁绍刚 黄俏俏.生态博物馆理论与践行模式对我国农业文化遗产保护的意义[J].中国农史,2017,36(06):130.
　DING Shao-gang HUANG Qiao-qiao.Consideration on the Protection of Agricultural Heritage Based on the Theory and Practice of Ecomuseum[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(03):130.
[4]韩凝玉 张 哲 王思明.农业文化遗产传播的媒体应用模式探析[J].中国农史,2016,35(03):132.
　HAN Ning-yu ZHANG Zhe WANG Si-ming.A Prospective Study on the Mode of Media Applications of Agricultural Heritage Communication[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(03):132.
[5]李 明 路 璐.学术话语体系和学术共同体：中国农业文化遗产研究的回顾与展望——兼评《中国农业文化遗产》书系[J].中国农史,2016,35(06):121.
　LI Ming LU Lu.Academic Discourse System and Academic Community: A Review and Prospect of the Research on Agri-cultural Heritage in China——Comment on "Agri-cultural Heritage in China " Series[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(03):121.
[6]伽红凯 王思明.非均衡发展：农业文化遗产地的反迁移效应[J].中国农史,2020,39(01):125.
　QIE Hong-kai WANG Si-ming.Unbalanced Development: The Anti-migration Effect of Agricultural Cultural Heritage Sites[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(03):125.
[7]朱 娅 李 明.农业文化遗产话语互动、变迁及体系建构[J].中国农史,2020,39(06):129.
　ZHU Ya LI Ming.Interaction, Change and System Construction of Agricultural Heritage Discourse[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(03):129.
[8]徐业鑫.文化失忆与重建：基于社会记忆视角的农业文化遗产价值挖掘与保护传承[J].中国农史,2021,40(02):137.
　XU Ye-xin.The Value and Protection of Agricultural Heritage from the Perspective of Social Memory[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(03):137.
[9]伽红凯 卢 勇 陈 晖.环境适应与技术选择：明清以来长三角地区特色农业发展研究[J].中国农史,2021,40(04):127.
　QIE Hong-kai LU Yong CHEN Hui.Environmental Adaptation and Technology Selection: Research on the Development of Characteristic Agriculture in the Yangtze River Delta Region since Ming and Qing Dynasties[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(03):127.
[10]朱志平 王思明.价值挖掘与路径选择：长三角地区农业文化遗产传承与利用研究[J].中国农史,2021,40(06):134.
　ZHU Zhi-ping WANG Si-ming.Value Discovery and Path Selection:Research on the Inheritance and Utilization of Agricultural Heritage in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(03):134.

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-07-03