构建中国环境史研究全球话语权刍论——基于海外研究相关认识及其辨析的探讨-《中国农史》

文章信息/Info

Title:: A Discussion on the Construction of the Global Discourse Power in the Study of Chinese Environmental History——An Exploration Based on Overseas Research Related Conclusions and Analysis

Author(s):: CHEN Yexin; （School of Humanities, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240）

Keywords:: academic discourse power; Chinese environmental history; conclusion analysis; overseas research

摘要:: 学术话语权是构建中国学术“话语体系”的重要内容之一。1960年代以来，海外如欧美、日本等学者对中国环境史进行了较多的研究，其研究论著陆续为国内学界熟知。但通过对墨菲、休斯、伊懋可和日本学者等海外关于中国环境史研究成果的梳理发现，由于研究目的、文化传统、价值观念等主客观原因使然，其相关认识存在论证粗疏、差错乖误、自相抵牾、有失于允恰乃至“西方中心论”支配下的傲慢、偏见等情况。中国历史环境当以国内学者深入研究形成的认识为准，构建中国环境史研究全球学术话语权，既是深化中国环境史研究的重要举措，更是对海外研究错误结论乃至西方本位主义错误认知进行有效回应和深刻批判的需要。

Abstract:: Academic discourse power is one of the important components in building China’s academic discourse system. Since the 1960s, scholars from overseas countries such as Europe, America, and Japan have conducted extensive research on Chinese environmental history, and their research works have gradually become well-known in the domestic academic community. But through a review of overseas research on Chinese environmental history by scholars such as Rhoads Murphy, Hughes, Mark Elvin, and Japanese scholars, it was found that due to subjective and objective reasons such as research objectives, cultural traditions, and values, their conclusions are characterized by rough arguments, errors, self-contradiction, inaccuracies, and even arrogance and prejudice under the domination of Western-centrism. The historical environment of China should be based on the understanding formed by domestic scholars through in-depth research. Constructing a global academic discourse power in the study of Chinese environmental history is not only an important measure to deepen research on Chinese environmental history, but also a necessary response and profound criticism of erroneous conclusions in overseas research and even Western-centrism misconceptions.