[1]邓玉函 罗国奡.梯田农业文化遗产中的人与牛关系变迁及生态问题研究——以湘中紫鹊界梯田为例[J].中国农史,2025,(02):129-140.
　DENG Yuhan LUO Guoao.Study on the Relationship between Humans and Cattle and Ecological Problems in Terraced Agricultural Cultural Heritage——Taking Ziquejie Terrace in Central Hunan Province as an Example[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2025,(02):129-140.
点击复制

梯田农业文化遗产中的人与牛关系变迁及生态问题研究——以湘中紫鹊界梯田为例()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
129-140
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Relationship between Humans and Cattle and Ecological Problems in Terraced Agricultural Cultural Heritage——Taking Ziquejie Terrace in Central Hunan Province as an Example
作者:
邓玉函 罗国奡
（云南大学 西南边疆少数民族研究中心，云南 昆明 650091）
Author(s):
DENG Yuhan LUO Guoao
（National Centre for Borderlands Ethnic Studies in Southwest China, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091）
关键词:
农业文化遗产; 人与牛; 紫鹊界梯田; 关系民族志
Keywords:
agricultural heritage;  Ziquejie terrace;  humans and cattle;  relational ethnography;  ecological issues
分类号:
S-09；K217
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过考察紫鹊界梯田中人与牛的关系可以发现，他们在农业生产中驯化与合作，在日常生活中照料与互助，在地方信仰中庇护与共建，形成了互惠共生的关系模式，并协同塑造了梯田农业文化遗产。然而，随着社会文化的现代转型，牛的命运逐渐被人所主宰和控制，人和牛的关系转变为单向支配，并表现为牛的数量锐减、牛的商品化和污秽化等现象。这一变化的背后，反映了人与自然关系的根本性变迁，双方从和谐共生走向了对立冲突，并最终表现为梯田旱化荒芜、土壤化学污染和灌溉系统受损等生态问题。由此可言，文化制衡的本质是关系制衡，后者是农业文化遗产可持续发展的安全阀。农业文化遗产研究不仅要关注到遗产地居民的日常生活实践，更要将这种实践置于人类与非人类主体之间的关系网络之中，从而在关系主义的视阈下推进农业文化遗产保护和新时代的乡村建设。
Abstract:
By examining the relationship between humans and cattle in Ziqueji Terrace, it can be found that they domesticated and cooperated in agricultural production, cared for and helped each other in daily life, sheltered and co-constructed in local beliefs, formed a mutually beneficial and symbiotic relationship mode, and jointly shaped the Agricultural Cultural Heritage of terrace. However, with the modern transformation of society and culture, the fate of cattle gradually came under human control and domination, and the relationship between humans and cattle shifted from a mutual harmony to a one-way dominance, manifesting itself in the sharp decline of cattle numbers, the commodification and contamination of cattle. Behind this change, it reflects the fundamental changes of the relationship between humans and nature. The two sides have moved from harmonious coexistence to confrontation and conflict, and finally manifested as ecological problems such as terrace desertification, soil chemical pollution and damage to irrigation systems. Therefore, it can be said that the essence of cultural check and balance is relational check and balance. Relational check and balance is the safety valve for the sustainable development of agricultural cultural heritage. Research on agricultural cultural heritage should not only pay attention to the daily life practice of the residents in the heritage site, but also put this practice in the relationship network between human and non-human subjects, so as to promote the protection of agricultural cultural heritage and rural construction in the new era from the perspective of relationalism.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴合显.论重要农业文化遗产的当代创新利用[J].中国农史,2018,37(01):115.
　WU He-xian.Analysis on Contemporary Innovation and Utilization of Outstanding Agricultural Heritage Systems[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2018,37(02):115.
[2]张 苏.边疆少数民族农业文化遗产与一带一路文化交流[J].中国农史,2017,36(01):129.
　ZHANG Su.The Agricultural Heritage of Ethnic Minorities in China’s Border Areas and the Culture Communication of “the Belt and Road”[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(02):129.
[3]丁绍刚 黄俏俏.生态博物馆理论与践行模式对我国农业文化遗产保护的意义[J].中国农史,2017,36(06):130.
　DING Shao-gang HUANG Qiao-qiao.Consideration on the Protection of Agricultural Heritage Based on the Theory and Practice of Ecomuseum[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(02):130.
[4]韩凝玉 张 哲 王思明.农业文化遗产传播的媒体应用模式探析[J].中国农史,2016,35(03):132.
　HAN Ning-yu ZHANG Zhe WANG Si-ming.A Prospective Study on the Mode of Media Applications of Agricultural Heritage Communication[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(02):132.
[5]李 明 路 璐.学术话语体系和学术共同体：中国农业文化遗产研究的回顾与展望——兼评《中国农业文化遗产》书系[J].中国农史,2016,35(06):121.
　LI Ming LU Lu.Academic Discourse System and Academic Community: A Review and Prospect of the Research on Agri-cultural Heritage in China——Comment on "Agri-cultural Heritage in China " Series[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(02):121.
[6]伽红凯 王思明.非均衡发展：农业文化遗产地的反迁移效应[J].中国农史,2020,39(01):125.
　QIE Hong-kai WANG Si-ming.Unbalanced Development: The Anti-migration Effect of Agricultural Cultural Heritage Sites[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(02):125.
[7]朱 娅 李 明.农业文化遗产话语互动、变迁及体系建构[J].中国农史,2020,39(06):129.
　ZHU Ya LI Ming.Interaction, Change and System Construction of Agricultural Heritage Discourse[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(02):129.
[8]徐业鑫.文化失忆与重建：基于社会记忆视角的农业文化遗产价值挖掘与保护传承[J].中国农史,2021,40(02):137.
　XU Ye-xin.The Value and Protection of Agricultural Heritage from the Perspective of Social Memory[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(02):137.
[9]伽红凯 卢 勇 陈 晖.环境适应与技术选择：明清以来长三角地区特色农业发展研究[J].中国农史,2021,40(04):127.
　QIE Hong-kai LU Yong CHEN Hui.Environmental Adaptation and Technology Selection: Research on the Development of Characteristic Agriculture in the Yangtze River Delta Region since Ming and Qing Dynasties[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(02):127.
[10]朱志平 王思明.价值挖掘与路径选择：长三角地区农业文化遗产传承与利用研究[J].中国农史,2021,40(06):134.
　ZHU Zhi-ping WANG Si-ming.Value Discovery and Path Selection:Research on the Inheritance and Utilization of Agricultural Heritage in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(02):134.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-18