[1]伽红凯.中国传统村落保护的矛盾与模式探析[J].中国农史,2016,35(06):136-144.
　QIE Hong-kai.Contradictions and Modes of Chinese Traditional Villages Conservation[J].SAMSON,2016,35(06):136-144.
点击复制

中国传统村落保护的矛盾与模式探析()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
35
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
136-144
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-12-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Contradictions and Modes of Chinese Traditional Villages Conservation
作者:
伽红凯
（南京农业大学 中华农业文明研究院，江苏 南京 210095）
Author(s):
QIE Hong-kai
(Institution of Chinese Agricultural Civilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095)
关键词:
传统村落保护; 矛盾; 路径选择
Keywords:
conservation for traditional villages;  contradiction;  path choice
分类号:
S-09；K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过厘清中国传统村落保护与城镇化、农业现代化、新农村建设和农户福利提升之间的矛盾，分析在矛盾冲突下其得以留存的原因，以反映传统村落的发展现状及其保护的重要性；基于经济学视角，借鉴“公地悲剧”的破解思路，提出十种传统村落保护模式，即罚款与补贴模式、名录保护模式、文保模式、农民退出模式、农民自主开发模式、社区主导开发模式、公司主导开发模式、综合开发模式、博物馆模式以及保护区模式，为中国传统村落的可持续利用提供路径选择。
Abstract:
This paper clarifies the contradictions between the conservation for Chinese traditional villages and urbanization, agricultural modernization, new rural construction and farmers’ welfare enhancing, and analyzes the reason why it can be retained under these contradictions, in order to reflect the development status of traditional villages and the importance of protection. Based on the perspective of economics and drawing lessons from the "Tragedy of the Commons", this paper proposes ten protection modes of traditional villages, including fines and subsidies mode, directory protection mode, heritage conservation mode, farmers’ exiting mode, farmers’ self development mode, community-driven development mode, company-driven development mode, comprehensive development mode, museum mode and reserve mode, in order to provide the path choices for the sustainable utilization of Chinese traditional villages.
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01