[1]路 璐 王思明.大运河文化遗产研究：现状、不足与展望[J].中国农史,2019,38(04):137-145.
　LU Lu WANG Si-ming.The Study on Cultural Heritage of the Grand Canal: The Achievements， the Lack and the Advisements[J].SAMSON,2019,38(04):137-145.
点击复制

大运河文化遗产研究：现状、不足与展望()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
38
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
137-145
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Study on Cultural Heritage of the Grand Canal: The Achievements， the Lack and the Advisements
作者:
路 璐 王思明
（南京农业大学 中华农业文明研究院,江苏 南京 210095）
Author(s):
LU Lu WANG Si-ming
（Branch Institute of Agricultural Civilization of the Grand Canal; Center for Geographical Indications in China; Nanjing Agricultural University， Nanjing 210095）
关键词:
大运河; 文化遗产; 文化记忆
Keywords:
The Grand Canal;  cultural heritage;  cultural?memory
分类号:
S-09；K219
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
大运河是中国历史上南北商业、经济交通与文化交流的大动脉，2014年大运河成功入选世界文化遗产名录，成为全人类的精神财富。目前，大运河文化遗产研究已逐步展开，在保护什么与如何保护方面取得一定成果。而研究不足也较为明显，如尚未清晰认知大运河文化带遗产类型、尚未聚焦大运河文化带的双重特性以及只是粗浅罗列、尚未精准梳理大运河文化带的价值维度。在研究展望中，提出把握大运河文化遗产研究的三组张力即传承与重构、下沉与上升以及举国动员与深耕民意之间的关系，为大运河文化遗产开枝散叶、走向全民共享的公共文化空间建言献策。
Abstract:
The Grand Canal has made connection of commerce， transportation and cultural exchange between the North and the South in Chinese history. In 2014， the Grand Canal was listed in the World Cultural Heritage List and was considered as the spiritual wealth of all mankind. Currently， studies on the cultural heritage of the Grand Canal have had some achievements， including what is value to protect and how to protect， and so on. However， there is also obvious lack on the research， that is a clear understanding of the heritage type of Cultural Belt of the Grand Canal， the double characteristics of Cultural Belt of the Grand Canal， and the value dimension of Cultural Belt of the Grand Canal， which are not studied deeply and accurately. The aim of this study， three groups of tensions in the study of， namely， having a good command of inheritance and reconstruction， sinking and rising， and the relationship between national mobilization and the public opinion is important to understand the Cultural Belt of the Grand Canal. Also， this study has made efforts to make advice for the development of the cultural heritage of the Grand Canal and lead it to the public cultural space and to be shared by the public.

相似文献/References:

[1]李 红.日本稻作祭祀文化内涵及其遗产保护经验[J].中国农史,2018,37(03):136.
　LI Hong.The Connotation of Japanese Paddy Cultivation Sacrificial Culture and the Experience of Heritage Protection[J].SAMSON,2018,37(04):136.
[2]李建军.英国传统村落保护的核心理念及其实现机制[J].中国农史,2017,36(03):115.
　LI Jian-jun.The Core Ideas of Traditional British Village Protection and Its Realization Mechanism[J].SAMSON,2017,36(04):115.
[3]胡 燕 张逸鑫 严 昊.二十四节气农耕民俗的误读与认知[J].中国农史,2017,36(06):34.
　HU Yan ZHANG Yi-xin YAN Hao.Misunderstanding and Cognition of Farming Folk Custom in the Twenty-four Solar Terms[J].SAMSON,2017,36(04):34.
[4]关剑平.日本对茶关联遗产的整合及其未来走向[J].中国农史,2017,36(06):122.
　GUAN Jian-ping.Integration and Future Trend of Tea Related Heritage in Japan[J].SAMSON,2017,36(04):122.
[5]杨 虎.《齐民要术》中的养生与保健思想探究[J].中国农史,2019,38(02):115.
　YANG Hu.The Health and Care Thoughts in Qi Min Yao Shu[J].SAMSON,2019,38(04):115.
[6]卢 勇 冯 培.20世纪以来大运河水利史研究的反思与前瞻[J].中国农史,2019,38(05):134.
　LU Yong FENG Pei.Reflections and Prospects on the Study of the Grand Canal Water Conservancy History since the 20th Century[J].SAMSON,2019,38(04):134.
[7]李 燕 李 明.大运河与扬州文化基因研究[J].中国农史,2021,40(05):122.
　LI Yan LI Ming.The Grand Canal and Yangzhou Cultural Genes[J].SAMSON,2021,40(04):122.
[8]王 荧 沈志忠.大运河与淮扬饮食文化的融合与发展[J].中国农史,2023,42(01):61.
　WANG Ying SHEN Zhi-zhong.The Fusion and Development of the Grand Canal and Huaiyang Food Culture[J].SAMSON,2023,42(04):61.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-12