[1]赵飒飒 卢中阳.再议西双版纳封建领主制[J].中国农史,2020,39(04):53-60.
　ZHAO Sa-sa LU Zhong-yang.Discussion on the Feudal Lord System in Xishuangbanna[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(04):53-60.
点击复制

再议西双版纳封建领主制()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
39
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
53-60
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Discussion on the Feudal Lord System in Xishuangbanna
作者:
赵飒飒 卢中阳
（1. 西北工业大学外国语学院，陕西 西安 710129；2. 陕西师范大学历史文化学院，陕西 西安 710119）
Author(s):
ZHAO Sa-sa LU Zhong-yang
(1.School of Foreign Studies, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129;2.School of History and Civilization, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119)
关键词:
西双版纳; 封建领主制; 奴隶制
Keywords:
Xishuangbanna; Feudal Lord System;  slavery
分类号:
S-09；K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
西双版纳封建领主制作为社会史论战的产物，既缺乏科学论证又存在分歧。封建领主制的核心内涵是“大土地所有制”和“封建等级土地制”，这与傣勐及山区民族对寨田的集体所有权存在冲突和矛盾。封建制因素萌生于滚很召等级中，但直至民主改革前，无论从土地面积还是统治人户上均不占主体地位，奴隶主与奴隶之间的矛盾仍然是社会主要矛盾。因此历史时期西双版纳并未进化到封建领主制阶段，应属于奴隶制。
Abstract:
The judgement of Xishuangbanna as Feudal Lord System was the result of social nature debating, which is lack of scientific demonstration and varies in opinions. The core connotation of Feudal Lord System is“large land ownership”and“feudal hierarchical land system”, which conflicts with the collective ownership of Zhai farmland by Daimeng and mountain nationalities. Feudal features came from Gunhenzhao, however they did not occupy the dominant position in terms of land area or dominant populations before the Democratic Reform. The contradiction between slave owners and slaves was still the main one in society; therefore, Xishuangbanna did not evolve to the stage of Feudal Lord System in the history, but should belong to slavery.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-15