[1]骆详译.西夏土地的典卖、土地产权与宋夏的“一田二主制”[J].中国农史,2019,38(02):64-73.
 LUO Xiang-yi.Research on the Live-sale of the Lands and the Property Rights of Land in Xixia and Compare with the "one field two owners " in Song and Xixia[J].SAMSON,2019,38(02):64-73.
点击复制

西夏土地的典卖、土地产权与宋夏的“一田二主制”()
分享到:

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
38
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
64-73
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Live-sale of the Lands and the Property Rights of Land in Xixia and Compare with the "one field two owners " in Song and Xixia
作者:
骆详译
(南京师范大学 社会发展学院,江苏 南京 210097)
Author(s):
LUO Xiang-yi
(College of Society Development, Nanjing Nomal University, Nanjing 210097)
关键词:
西夏宋代典卖土地产权一田二主制
Keywords:
XixiaSong Dynastylive-salethe property rights of landone field two owners
分类号:
S-09;K212
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
西夏原主人将土地出典后,虽然仍拥有其土地所有权,但只有在付清承典人的本利钱后,原主人才能将出典的土地交易,这与宋代原主人在土地出典的同时,将土地所有权出卖给第三方有着很大的区别。这说明西夏出典的土地所有权被分割,也能反映出西夏的土地流转未如宋代那般自由与频繁。在典权兼具用益物权与担保物权功能的特点上,西夏与宋代相似。从赋役科派与籍帐编制的角度来看,西夏的承典人与宋代相类,都具有“二地主”的身份,都是国家科派赋役的对象,并登入国家租税簿册中。西夏的土地典卖中,也存在类似于宋代的“一田二主制”。
Abstract:
After the original owner of the Xixia live-sale of lands, although he still owns the land ownership, the original owner can only trade the land of the code after paying the original profit of the creator. There is a big difference between the land is issued at the same time selling to a third party of the Song Dynasty. It shows that the land ownership is divided of in Xixia, which also reflects that the land transfer in Xixia is not as free and frequent as the Song Dynasty. Xixia is similar to the Song Dynasty in the characteristics of the right of concept and the function of usufructuary and security. From the point of view of the servant division and the accounting establishment, the pledgee of Xixia and the Song Dynasty have the same status as "two landlords", which are the targets of the national sects and are registered in the national tax book. In the land sale of Xixia, there is also a "one field two owners" similar to the Song Dynasty.

相似文献/References:

[1]柴国生.生物质燃料利用与我国古代农业的生态循环发展——以宋代为中心[J].中国农史,2018,37(04):127.
 CHAI Guo-sheng.Ecological Cycle Development between Utilization of Biomass Fuel and Chinese Ancient Agriculture——Centered for Song Dynasty[J].SAMSON,2018,37(02):127.
[2]赵九洲.宋代传统燃料危机问题新论——与王星光、柴国生先生商榷[J].中国农史,2018,37(06):99.
 ZHAO Jiu-zhou.A New Research about the Traditional Fuel Crisis in the Song Dynasty[J].SAMSON,2018,37(02):99.
[3]王 旭 郭声波.鹿胎消费与宋人的环保意识[J].中国农史,2016,35(01):113.
 WANG Xu GUO Sheng-bo.Killing,Demand and Prohibition:a Luxury of Song Dynasty——the Consumption and Motivation of Deer Fetus[J].SAMSON,2016,35(02):113.
[4]顾成瑞 刘 欣.唐宋时期粮食年成奏报制度述论——从天圣《赋役令》宋4条不能复原为唐令说起[J].中国农史,2016,35(02):58.
 GU Cheng-rui LIU Xin.A Study on the Reporting System of Crop Yield in the Tang and Song Dynasties[J].SAMSON,2016,35(02):58.
[5]衣保中 朱正西.宋代广西地区移民与农业发展研究[J].中国农史,2016,35(03):22.
 YI Bao-zhong Zhu Zheng-xi.The Research on the Immigrant of Guangxi in Song dynasty and Agricultural Development[J].SAMSON,2016,35(02):22.
[6]周方高 彭露.宋代湖南地区的茶业经济研究[J].中国农史,2016,35(04):39.
 ZHOU Fang-gao PENG Lu.Research on Tea Economy of Hunan in Song Dynasty[J].SAMSON,2016,35(02):39.
[7]安北江.黑水城出土748号税制文书考释——兼论西夏“通检推排”[J].中国农史,2019,38(01):66.
 An Bei-jiang.A Study on the No.748 Tax System Documents Unearthed from Khara-khoto:Concurrently Discuss the “Investigation of People’s Accounts and Assets ” System of Tangut[J].SAMSON,2019,38(02):66.
[8]柴国生.“燃料荒”还是“燃料危机”:再论宋代燃料安全问题——兼与赵九洲商榷[J].中国农史,2019,38(01):106.
 CHAI Guo-sheng.Fuel Shortage Or Fuel Crisis: Further Discussion on Cruel Safety in Song Dynasty——Furthermore Deliberate With Mr Zhao Jiuzhou[J].SAMSON,2019,38(02):106.
[9]田晓霈.黑水城出土西夏文典地契研究[J].中国农史,2019,38(04):55.
 TIAN Xiao-pei.Research on the Land Sale Contracts in Tangut Script Unearthed in Khara-Khoto[J].SAMSON,2019,38(02):55.
[10]章珂熔 胡 燕 应瑞瑶.宋代茶政的当代追问——以茶叶经济制度为例[J].中国农史,2020,39(02):81.
 ZHANG Ke-rong HU Yan YING Rui-yao.The Contemporary Questioning of Tea Policy in the Song Dynasty——Taking the Tea Economic System as an Example[J].SAMSON,2020,39(02):81.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01