[1]张小坡.近代徽州茶商的同业组织及劳资关系处理[J].中国农史,2018,37(03):86-96.
　ZHANG Xiao-po.Processing Business Leagues and Labor Relations in Modern Huizhou Tea Merchants[J].SAMSON,2018,37(03):86-96.
点击复制

近代徽州茶商的同业组织及劳资关系处理()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
37
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
86-96
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-06-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Processing Business Leagues and Labor Relations in Modern Huizhou Tea Merchants
文章编号:
1000-4459（2018）03-0086-11
作者:
张小坡
 （1.安徽大学徽学研究中心，安徽 合肥 230039；2.中国社会科学院 历史研究所，北京 100732）
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiao-po
(1.Center for Hui Studies, Anhui University, Hefei 230039；2.Institute of History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732)
关键词:
徽州; 茶商; 同业组织; 劳资纠纷
Keywords:
Huizhou;  tea merchant;  business leagues;  disputes between capital and labour
分类号:
S-09；K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
近代徽州茶商的同业组织主要分布在茶叶的生产地徽州和销售地上海，徽州境内的茶商同业组织不断演变，并构筑起覆盖茶产地的组织网络。上海星江敦梓堂茶业公所是茶商、茶栈工头、茶工的联合体，其中心事务是维护茶工福利和调解三方矛盾。近代徽州茶商同业组织在成立初期实行董事制，其后改为委员制，突出民主决策，集体管理，强调对权力的监督制衡。1926年发生的星江敦梓堂茶业公所章程修正案和茶工要求增加工资案是当时中国众多劳资纠纷中比较典型的案例，由于劳资双方均来自徽州，具有乡谊关系，在纠纷处理过程中，更多地依赖同业和同乡组织居中调处。
Abstract:
The modern Huizhou tea merchants business leagues were mainly distributed in the tea production of Huizhou and sales of Shanghai, Huizhou tea business leagues continued to evolve and built the main tea producing organization network. Shanghai Star River Dunzi Tang tea hall was combination of tea merchants, tea foremen, tea workers, which mainly revolved around the contradictions between the tea workers and the three parties. The modern Huizhou tea merchants guild practiced the implementation of the board in the early days, and then changed into the committee system, which emphasizing on democratic decision making, collective management, supervision and limited power. The case of amendments to the Constitution of the Star River Dunzi Tang tea hall and the case of demanding an increase in wages were typical cases of Chinese many labor disputes in 1926. Because both sides coming from Huizhou, when they were in the process of handling disputes, they more depended on the mediating of the same industry and the fellow townships with their relationship.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈 瑞.明清徽州官府和地方社会对假命图赖问题的管控与治理[J].中国农史,2020,39(01):90.
　CHEN Rui.The Official and Local Society’ Management and Control on Jia Ming Tu Lai（假命图赖） of Huizhou in Ming and Qing Dynasties[J].SAMSON,2020,39(03):90.
[2]康 健.晚清徽州乡村社会的日常生活图景——以《局董日记》为中心的考察[J].中国农史,2020,39(05):97.
　KANG Jian.The Prospect about Daily Life of Huizhou Rural Society in Late Qing Dynasty：An Investigation Centered on the Diary of Judong[J].SAMSON,2020,39(03):97.
[3]赵士第 叶 鹏.民国时期徽州乡村医者的医事活动、行医范围与日常生活——以《民国婺源医家日记》为中心[J].中国农史,2021,40(02):103.
　ZHAO Shi-di YE Peng.Medical Activities, Practice Scope and Daily Life of a Rural Doctor in Huizhou during the Period of the Republic of China: A Case Study of Wuyuan Doctor’s Diary in Republic of China[J].SAMSON,2021,40(03):103.
[4]池子华 戴少刚.徽州五猖信仰的近代际遇与社会变迁[J].中国农史,2021,40(04):95.
　CHI Zi-hua DAI Shao-gang.Modern Encounters of Five-chang（五猖） Gods Belief in Huizhou Region and Its Influence on Societal Changes[J].SAMSON,2021,40(03):95.
[5]陈 瑞.“止种兴养”：清乾嘉年间徽州宗族处置生态危机的应变之策——以祁门环溪王氏履和堂宗族为中心[J].中国农史,2021,40(05):108.
　CHEN Rui.Stop Planting to Preserving：Countermeasures of Huizhou Clans in Dealing with Ecological Crisis during the Qianlong and Jiaqing Period in Qing Dynasty[J].SAMSON,2021,40(03):108.
[6]刘永学 胡阿祥.何以“盐豆”：明代苏浙与徽州“地讳”的解说[J].中国农史,2022,41(04):109.
　LIU Yong-xue HU A-xiang.What is the So-called "Salt Beans" ： An Explanation of the "DiHui（地讳）" in Suzhou, Zhejiang and Huizhou in Ming Dynasty[J].SAMSON,2022,41(03):109.
[7]陈 瑞.明清时期徽州境内的社会治安管控——基于组织机构设置与运作视域的考察[J].中国农史,2023,42(04):122.
　CHEN Rui.Public Order Control in Huizhou during the Ming and Qing Dynasties：Based on the Perspective of the Organizations’ Establishment and Operation[J].SAMSON,2023,42(03):122.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[收稿日期] 2018-03-14
[基金项目] 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“近代徽州民众日常生活与社会变迁研究”(16JJD770001)；国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“明清以来徽州会馆文献整理与研究”(14ZDB034)
[作者简介] 张小坡(1979- ），男，博士，安徽大学徽学研究中心副研究员、硕士生导师，中国社会科学院历史研究所博士后，主要研究方向为徽学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-26