[1]李重蓉.汉代的“鸮”：艺术史、信仰史与农史的考察[J].中国农史,2022,41(06):11-28.
　LI Chong-rong.The Owl in Han Dynasty: Investigating from Art, Agricultural and Belief History[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2022,41(06):11-28.
点击复制

汉代的“鸮”：艺术史、信仰史与农史的考察()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
41
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
11-28
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Owl in Han Dynasty: Investigating from Art, Agricultural and Belief History
作者:
李重蓉
（中国国家博物馆，北京 100006）
Author(s):
LI Chong-rong
（National Museum of China, Beijing 100006）
关键词:
汉代; 鸮鸟; 分类; 功能寓意; 图文差异
Keywords:
Han dynasty;  owl;  classification;  function;  difference between document and image
分类号:
S-09；K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
汉代鸮鸟形象的文物表现，通常见于器物与画像，画像资料又可按照组合对象与方式分为三类。从分布地域上看，器物相对偏北、偏西北方，画像则偏东、偏东南方；从流行的时段看，器物可能比画像更早。鸮形器物的功能偏实用性，体现出汉代人在重农理念背景下鼠害防范意识的增强，从而保护农产品的安全。鸮形器物在北边的集中发现，或许与缓解政策移民的生存焦虑有关。鸮鸟画像的象征意义可以通过信仰观念的分析予以解释。其功用应与保障死后安宁并协助升仙有关。文献资料可见视鸮鸟为恶鸟的意识，但画像中的鸮鸟却似乎多为正面形象。造成这种差异的原因比较复杂，有待于从生死观念的不同、身份主体的差异、使用目的的区别进行探索和说明。
Abstract:
The owl history relic in Han dynasty included material object and portrait. The portrait can be clarified to three styles. From distribution area, the owl material object was more north and northwest, while the portrait was more east and southeast. From popular period, the owl material object was earlier than portrait. The owl on material object might be used to relieve the Han immigration’s life anxiety, such as to prevent rodents and protect agriculture. And the owl in portrait might be used to relieve people’s death anxiety, which meant to protect seal’s peace and help it to ascent to immortality. The difference between image and document manifested that in the document the owl was a vicious bird, while the owl in image was positive. The reason for the difference was complex, reminding to explore the different concept of life and death, the subject of different identities and the purpose of use.

相似文献/References:

[1]符 奎.三杨庄遗址汉代聚落的耕作环境与方法[J].中国农史,2017,36(01):15.
　FU Kui.On the Cultivation Environment and Tillage Method of the Settlement of the Sanyangzhuang Site in the Han Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(06):15.
[2]官德祥.汉文化中“狗”的角色[J].中国农史,2018,37(05):87.
　GUAN De-xiang.The Role of “Dog” in the Culture of Han dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2018,37(06):87.
[3]杨乙丹.汉代官方农业放贷：发展趋势、运行结构与制度审视[J].中国农史,2017,36(04):66.
　YANG Yi-dan.A Study on the Agricultural Loaning System of Han Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(06):66.
[4]熊帝兵.关于《氾胜之书》“积穰于沟间”的释读[J].中国农史,2017,36(05):57.
　XIONG Di-bing.Explanation on Function of Stalk in Fanshengzhishu[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(06):57.
[5]张 斌.汉代的田庐[J].中国农史,2016,35(02):90.
　ZHANG Bin.A Study on the Field Hut in Han Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(06):90.
[6]符 奎.三杨庄遗址汉代聚落的形态[J].中国农史,2019,38(05):41.
　FU Kui.On the Settlement Pattern of the Sanyangzhuang Site in the Han dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2019,38(06):41.
[7]吴方浪.简牍所见“专职”士吏与汉代边郡粮食管理[J].中国农史,2020,39(03):69.
　WU Fang-lang.The “Full-time”（专职）Shili（士吏）and Border County Food Management of Han Dynasty which Seen in the Bamboo Slips[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(06):69.
[8]吴方浪.简牍所见“专职”士吏与汉代边郡粮食管理（续）[J].中国农史,2020,39(04):42.
　WU Fang-lang.The “Full-time”（专职）Shili（士吏）and Border County Food Management of Han Dynasty which Seen in the Bamboo Slips[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(06):42.
[9]尹 达 魏 然 卜彦博 孙 勐.汉代北京地区农业结构与特点——以路县故城遗址冶铸遗存浮选结果为例[J].中国农史,2024,43(04):101.
　YIN Da WEI Ran BU Yanbo SUN Meng.Preliminary Study on Agricultural Structure During Han Dynasty in Beijing : Taking Charred Plant Remains from Smelting Remains in Heritage Site at the Ancient Government Seat of Luxian County as An Example[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2024,43(06):101.

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-13