[1]卢 勇 冯 培.20世纪以来大运河水利史研究的反思与前瞻[J].中国农史,2019,38(05):134-144.
 LU Yong FENG Pei.Reflections and Prospects on the Study of the Grand Canal Water Conservancy History since the 20th Century[J].SAMSON,2019,38(05):134-144.
点击复制

20世纪以来大运河水利史研究的反思与前瞻()
分享到:

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
38
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
134-144
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reflections and Prospects on the Study of the Grand Canal Water Conservancy History since the 20th Century
作者:
卢 勇 冯 培
(南京农业大学 中国农业遗产研究室,江苏 南京 210095)
Author(s):
LU Yong FENG Pei
(The Chinese Agricultural Heritage Research Center, Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095)
关键词:
大运河20世纪以来水利史反思与前瞻
Keywords:
the Grand Canal since the 20th century water conservancy history reflections and prospects
分类号:
S-09;K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
大运河是中国历史上最重要的水利工程之一,也是联合国教科文组织认定的世界文化遗产。唐宋以后,在政治中心北移、经济中心南移的背景下,大运河成为沟通南北经济政治文化的水陆轴心,延续民族大融合、国家大一统的内生纽带。大运河兴衰直接影响国家漕运与粮食安全,历代均将其视为国家经济命脉与政治生命线。清末叶以后,黄河北上,漕运废止,大运河研究却渐成显学。尤其是20世纪以来,大运河水利史研究成果颇丰。但多数研究者从人类中心主义视角出发,缺乏辩证统一的人—水整体论意识,致使研究面临诸多困境。因此今后的研究中,应注重多元史料的搜集与文本的深层阐释,确立定性与定量相结合的实证研究范式。从运河本体、人与运河、运河与社会三重维度出发,探讨河流修复、水体流通、生态涵养等新时期人—水互动的治理模式、生态意识与文化形态。
Abstract:
The Grand Canal is one of the most important water conservancy projects in Chinese history and also is a world cultural heritage recognized by UNESCO. After the Tang and Song Dynasties, under the background of the northward movement of the political center and the southward movement of the economic center, the Grand Canal became the water and land axis to communicate the economy, politics and culture between the north and the south, continuing the internal link of national integration and national unification.The rise and fall of the Grand Canal has a direct impact on national water transport and food security, which has been regarded as the lifeline of national economy and politics in past dynasties. After the late Qing Dynasty, when the Yellow River went north and the water transport was abolished, the study of the Grand Canal became more and more prominent. Especially since the 20th century, great achievements have been made in the study of the Grand Canal’s water conservancy history. However, from the perspective of anthropocentrism, most researchers lack the dialectical and unified consciousness of human-water holism, which makes the research face many difficulties.Therefore, in future research, we should pay attention to the collection of multiple historical materials and the deep interpretation of texts, and establish an empirical research paradigm combining qualitative and quantitative research.Starting from the three dimensions of canal itself, human and canal, canal and society, this paper explores the governance mode, ecological ideology and cultural ideology of human-water interaction in the new period, such as river restoration, water circulation and ecological conservation.

相似文献/References:

[1]路 璐 王思明.大运河文化遗产研究:现状、不足与展望[J].中国农史,2019,38(04):137.
 LU Lu WANG Si-ming.The Study on Cultural Heritage of the Grand Canal: The Achievements, the Lack and the Advisements[J].SAMSON,2019,38(05):137.
[2]李 燕 李 明.大运河与扬州文化基因研究[J].中国农史,2021,40(05):122.
 LI Yan LI Ming.The Grand Canal and Yangzhou Cultural Genes[J].SAMSON,2021,40(05):122.
[3]王 荧 沈志忠.大运河与淮扬饮食文化的融合与发展[J].中国农史,2023,42(01):61.
 WANG Ying SHEN Zhi-zhong.The Fusion and Development of the Grand Canal and Huaiyang Food Culture[J].SAMSON,2023,42(05):61.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-15