[1]刘 爽 惠富平.文本与技术:清代花谱的生成与传播[J].中国农史,2021,40(05):23-33.
 LIU Shuang HUI Fu-ping.Text and Technology: Generation and Dissemination of Flower Books in the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(05):23-33.
点击复制

文本与技术:清代花谱的生成与传播()
分享到:

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
40
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
23-33
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Text and Technology: Generation and Dissemination of Flower Books in the Qing Dynasty
作者:
刘 爽 惠富平
(南京农业大学 中华农业文明研究院,江苏 南京 210095)
Author(s):
LIU Shuang HUI Fu-ping
(Chinese Academy of Agriculture Civilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095)
关键词:
清代花谱文本技术传播
Keywords:
Qing Dynasty flower books text technology spread
分类号:
S-09;K207
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
清代花谱目前所见应为146部,较之明代花谱在菊花、兰花、月季三种专谱数量上大为增加。《广群芳谱》与《花镜》开拓了花谱创作的两种路径:一是朝廷官方提供的“厚民资生”的宏观价值导向;二是民间士人形成的“大而经济,微而理学”的价值旨趣。花谱文本受到了政治关涉、学术演进、个人兴趣的立体塑造,呈现出旨趣各异的文本形态。花谱技术实际上形成于士人园圃的地方性微观知识,花谱对园艺技术的实录往往滞后于技术的产生;花谱技术受制于悦目怡情、名花情结的审美标准,存在重文轻图的局限,现代学者在“科学想象”的语境下,对花谱文本进行增删改造,从侧面印证了花谱技术的缺憾;花谱置身于士士相因、士农相隔、士商相间的阶层交际网络中,其技术的交流、更新与传播终归无法突破阶层界限,亦难于走向近代转型。
Abstract:
There are about 146 flower books in the Qing Dynasty. Compared with the Ming Dynasty, the number of chrysanthemum, orchid and rose book has increased greatly. Guangqunfangpu(《广群芳谱》) and Huajing(《花镜》) created two ways of writing flower book: one is the value orientation provided by the government; the second is the value purport formed by the folk intellectuals. The text of flower book has been shaped by political involvement, academic evolution and personal interest, presenting different text forms of purposed interests. Flower technology is the local micro-knowledge formed in the scholar’s garden. The record of flower book to horticultural technology often lags behind. Due to the aesthetic standards and the complex of famous flowers, the technology has the limitation of emphasizing the text rather than the picture. In the context of "scientific imagination", modern scholars add, delete and transform the text of flower, which proves the shortcomings of the technology of flower books. In the social network between scholars, peasants and businessmen, flower books can not break through the boundaries of the stratum in terms of technical exchange, renewal and dissemination, and it is difficult to move towards the modern transformation.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘宗志.从清代社仓与义仓之差异看民间社会救济之增长[J].中国农史,2018,37(02):98.
[2]王培华 戴国庆.清代永定河下游与白洋淀的农业及其环境效应[J].中国农史,2018,37(02):128.
[3]施由明.论清代江西农村社会的溺女之风与宗族应对[J].中国农史,2017,36(05):100.
 SHI You-ming.The Ethos of “Female Infanticide ”in the Rural Society of Jiangxi in Qing Dynasty and Response of the Clans[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(05):100.
[4]黄忠鑫.山林经济变动与信贷契约书写的演变——清代歙县璜尖村的个案研究[J].中国农史,2017,36(06):101.
 HUANG Zhong-xin.Forestry Economy Changes for Evolution of the Form of Credit Contract——A Study Based on Huangjian Village of She County during Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2017,36(05):101.
[5]王大宾.人地关系与清代河南农业经营方式的调整[J].中国农史,2018,37(06):80.
 WANG Da-bin.The Relationship between Human and Land and the Economic Information of Agriculture in Henan Region in the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2018,37(05):80.
[6]王大宾.人地关系与作物组合——清代河南地区农作物构成[J].中国农史,2016,35(01):29.
 WANG Da-bin.Man-Land Relationship and Crop Combination——Crops Constitute in Henan in the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(05):29.
[7]李昕升 王思明.清代番薯在江西的引种和推广[J].中国农史,2016,35(02):39.
 LI Xin-sheng WANG Si-ming.Introduction and Spread of Sweet Potato in Jiangxi Province[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(05):39.
[8]李丹丹 王元林.清代肉桂产地变迁与国内外贸易探析[J].中国农史,2019,38(03):114.
 LI Dan-dan WANG Yuan-lin.Analysis on the Changes of Cinnamon Origin and Domestic and Foreign Trade in the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2019,38(05):114.
[9]盛 承.清代陕西长安咸宁二县乡村区划的演变[J].中国农史,2020,39(05):123.
 SHENG Cheng.Evolution of the Administrative Division under the County in ChangAn and XianNing county, Shaanxi Province During the Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2020,39(05):123.
[10]谢 祺.清代湘黔苗疆的粮饷供给模式及其分化原因探析[J].中国农史,2021,40(04):59.
 XIE Qi.Study on the Causes of the Differentiation of Grain and Rate Supply Mode in Hunan, Guizhou and Miao Areas in Qing Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(05):59.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-09