[1]察应坤.先锋的理论与妥协的实践——梁漱溟如何走上乡村建设道路述论[J].中国农史,2024,43(04):113-124.
 CHA Yingkun.Pioneering Theory and Compromising in Practice: A Discussion on How Liang Shuming Embarked on the Road of Rural Construction[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2024,43(04):113-124.
点击复制

先锋的理论与妥协的实践——梁漱溟如何走上乡村建设道路述论()
分享到:

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
43
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
113-124
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-08-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Pioneering Theory and Compromising in Practice: A Discussion on How Liang Shuming Embarked on the Road of Rural Construction
作者:
察应坤
(山东大学 儒学高等研究院,山东 济南 250100)
Author(s):
CHA Yingkun
(Advanced Institute of Confucian Studies,Shandong University,Jinan 250100)
关键词:
梁漱溟乡村建设王鸿一邹平实验县村学乡学
Keywords:
Liang Shuming rural reconstruction Wang Hongyi experimental county of Zouping village school and township school
分类号:
S-09;K216
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
梁漱溟乡村建设思想的逻辑出发点是其对社会问题和人生问题的思考。社会主义、佛学、儒学都是其思想的资源。北大教书,曹州、广州办学,北京“亲师取友同处共学”,广东办理乡治,山西村治考察等为其乡村建设理论的形成提供了现实参照,主编《村治月刊》,任职河南村治学院、主政山东乡村建设研究院使其理论和实践的融合得以实现,也凸显出两者巨大的张力。他对社会运动存在的“与政府应分而不分”“与农民应合而合不来”“彼此亦不能合而为一”有了深刻认识。尽管如此,梁漱溟对“中国老道理的真精神里开出一个新局面”仍然抱着一个乐观的认识。
Abstract:
The logical basis of Liang Shuming’s theory of rural reconstruction is his reflection on problems existing in social and personal life. Socialism, Buddhism, and Confucianism were academic resources for his theory. Some of Liang’s social activities supplied practical references for the formation of his theory, like teaching in Peking University, running schools in Caozhou and Guangzhou, organizing study groups with teachers and friends in Beijing, promoting township to be organized in Guangdong province, investigating Shanxi province’s village organization and so on. While some of his professional experience, like editing Cun Zhi Monthly, assuming duty at Village Organize Institute of Henan, supervising Research Institute of Rural Construction in Shandong, helped his theory to be further reconciled with the practice, it also revealed the huge tension between his theory and practice. Accordingly, Liang gained a deeper insight into the relationship between the rural reconstruction movement and both the government and peasants. Even so, Liang Shuming still holds an optimistic understanding of "opening up a new situation in the true spirit of China’s old principles".

相似文献/References:

[1]马斗成 刘文玉.南京国民政府时期青岛粮价波动与政府应对(1929—1937)[J].中国农史,2021,40(04):45.
 MA Dou-cheng LIU Wen-yu.Food Price Fluctuation and Government’s Responses during the Period of Nanjing National Government[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(04):45.
[2]张春鹏.1948年冀鲁豫边区的迷信活动与中国共产党的应对[J].中国农史,2022,41(05):136.
 ZHANG Chun-peng.Superstitious Activities in Hebei-Shandong-Henan Border Region in 1948 and the Communist Party of China’s Response[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2022,41(04):136.
[3]李 烊 刘祖云.近代中国乡村建设思想的回眸、反思与展望——以梁漱溟、晏阳初和费孝通为中心的考察[J].中国农史,2022,41(02):122.
 LI Yang LIU Zu-yun.Review, Reflection and Prospect of Rural Construction Thought in Modern China:An Investigation Centered on Liang Shu-ming,Yan Yang-chu and Fei Xiao-tong[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2022,41(04):122.

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-10