[1]刘伟杰.论明末常熟县“勒石治理”的实践及影响——以三通垦荒碑为中心[J].中国农史,2025,(01):120-131.
　LIU Weijie.The Practice and Influence of "Monumentalize Governance" in Changshu County in the Late Ming Dynasty：Centering on Three Steles of Land Reclamation[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2025,(01):120-131.
点击复制

论明末常熟县“勒石治理”的实践及影响——以三通垦荒碑为中心()
分享到：

《中国农史》[ISSN:1000-4459/CN:32-1061/S]

卷:
期数:
2025年01期
页码:
120-131
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Practice and Influence of "Monumentalize Governance" in Changshu County in the Late Ming Dynasty：Centering on Three Steles of Land Reclamation
作者:
刘伟杰
（清华大学 人文学院， 北京100084）
Author(s):
LIU Weijie
（School of Humanities，Tsinghua University，Beijing 100084）
关键词:
公文碑; 明代; 垦荒; 常熟
Keywords:
official document stele;  Ming Dynasty;  land reclamation;  Changshu County
分类号:
S-09；K216
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
万历四十六年（1618），苏州府常熟县奉院道府命令在衙门前先后颁立了三通垦荒碑。三碑不仅是异乡垦荒民越级呈告争取到的权益凭证，也反映出地方官府与民众之间互动形式的变化。同时作为垦荒政策公示的载体，勒石立碑也被视作一种规则建立方式，被辐射到相似状况的周边地区，引领新一轮的秩序更新。在此类碑石频立的背后，是地方官民对于“勒石治理”模式的共同认可，这种信任基础并非朝夕形成，而是通过日积月累的切磋协商，并经由实践反复检验所得出的较优解。
Abstract:
In 1618, Changshu County in Suzhou Prefecture constructed three land reclamation steles in front of the county office by order of the local higher authorities. The three steles were not only the vouchers for the rights and interests of the land reclamation, but also reflected the changes in the form of interaction between the local authorities and the people. At the same time, as a vehicle for publicizing land resettlement policies, the erection of these steles was also seen as a way of establishing rules, which were radiated to neighboring areas in similar conditions, leading to a new round of order renewal. Behind the frequent erection of such steles was the common recognition of local officials and citizens of the "monumentalize governance" model, a foundation of trust that was not formed overnight, but rather a better solution arrived at through repeated consultations over time and tested by practice.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈 瑞.明代合肥地区的畜牧业述论[J].中国农史,2016,35(04):14.
　CHEN Rui.A Review of the Animal Husbandry in Hefei Area in Ming Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2016,35(01):14.
[2]徐 静.明代宁夏镇“水头”研究[J].中国农史,2021,40(05):84.
　XU Jing.Study on "Shuitou"（水头） of Ningxia Town in Ming Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2021,40(01):84.
[3]吴兆庆 吴 滔.明代两畿鲁豫俵马折价和市场价格研究[J].中国农史,2022,41(01):64.
　WU Zhao-Qing WU Tao.The Converted Price and the Market Price of Biao Horses（俵马）in Northern and Southern Zhili as Well as Henan and Shandong in the Ming Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2022,41(01):64.
[4]展 龙 李争杰.明代地方农灾信息奏报及其决策价值研究[J].中国农史,2022,41(03):3.
　ZHAN Long LI Zheng-jie.Local Agricultural Disaster Information and Its Decision-making Value in the Ming Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2022,41(01):3.
[5]郝红暖.明代安徽地区的马政及其环境影响初探[J].中国农史,2022,41(06):63.
　HAO Hong-nuan.A Preliminary Study on the Horse Policy and Its Environmental Influence of Anhui Area in the Ming Dynasty[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2022,41(01):63.
[6]胡箫白.明代前中期汉藏交流的物质文化考察[J].中国农史,2024,43(06):68.
　HU Xiaobai.Material Culture in Early-mid Ming Sino-Tibetan Interaction[J].AGRICULTURAL HISTORY OF CHINA,2024,43(01):68.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-13